User-Centered Ergonomics in Orthotic Design: A Perspective on Assistive Technology
Main Article Content
Abstract
Orthosis as an integral and important part of Assistive Technology play a crucial role in enhancing mobility, stability, and functional independence for individuals with physical impairments. The design and biomechanical application of these orthotic devices must align with user-centric ergonomic principles to ensure maximum efficiency, comfort and user compliance. This paper highlights the fundamental ergonomic considerations in orthotic designs including biomechanical alignment, load distribution, energy conservation and human factors like cosmesis, ease of donning and doffing, safety and adaptability. Emphasis is placed on how ergonomically guided orthotic interventions can prevent secondary musculoskeletal problems, reduce rehabilitation time, and contribute to long-term adherence. By addressing the interaction between the human body and orthotic device, this paper underscores how ergonomics contributes to functional outcomes, quality of life and long-term adherence in rehabilitation. By aligning engineering design with human factors, the application of ergonomic principles in orthotic design bridges the gap between technology and patient-centered care.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Bahler, A. (1982). Principles of design for lower limb orthotics. Orthotics and Prosthetics, 36(4), 33–40. http://oandplibrary.org/op/pdf/1982_04_033.pdf
2. Hung, K., Cheung, H. Y., Wan, N., Lee, E., Pan, K., Liang, R., ... & Chow, D. H. K. (2021). Design, development, and evaluation of upper and lower limb orthoses with intelligent control for rehabilitation. IET Science, Measurement & Technology, 15(6), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1049/smt2.12074
3. Openshaw, S., Taylor, E., Minder, G., & Witherow, W. (2006). Ergonomics and design: A reference guide. Allsteel Inc. https://ehs.oregonstate.edu/sites/ehs.oregonstate.edu/files/pdf/ergo/ergonomicsanddesignreferenceguidewhitepaper.pdf
4. Parashar, U., Khalid, S., & Kumar, Y. (2020). The influence of foot orthotic interventions on workplace ergonomics. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 10(7), 147–152. https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.10_Issue.7_July2020/23.pdf
5. Radcliff, C. (2002). Biomechanical principles of orthotic design. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 14(1), 34–42.
6. Bowers, L. D., & Ross, M. A. (2010). Ergonomic considerations in orthotic design: A review. Rehabilitation Engineering, 18(2), 101–110.
7. Zatsiorsky, V. M. (2002). Kinetics of human motion. Human Kinetics.
8. Dufour, J. S., & Marras, W. S. (2003). Ergonomic modeling of orthotic devices: A systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 34(5), 429–438.
9. Moore, K. L., Dalley, A. F., & Agur, A. M. R. (2013). Clinically oriented anatomy (7th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
10. Neumann, D. A. (2016). Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
11. Goh, J. C. H., & Toh, S. L. (2000). Design and performance of orthotic devices: A biomechanical perspective. Medical Engineering & Physics, 22(2), 85–91.
12. Mavroidis, C., & Dubowsky, S. (2004). Intelligent robotic orthoses: Design and control strategies. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 20(1), 96–103.