Addressing Inequity in Assistive Products Through Healthcare Systems in India: A Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstracts
Background: Assistive technologies (AT) are crucial for enhancing individuality, productivity, and quality of life for persons with functional impairments. Despite their proven profits, significant inequities persist in access to assistive products, particularly in low-and middle-income countries like India.
Objective: This review scrutinizes the current landscape of assistive technologies establishment in India, evaluates economic and social returns on investment, and categorizes strategies to address inequities through healthcare system integration.
Results: Evidence demonstrates substantial returns on investment for assistive products, with wheelchairs increasing economic productivity by 20-40%, spectacles showing benefit-cost ratios of 5:1, and hearing aids yielding ninefold returns per dollar invested. India has established institutional mechanisms including the National Centre for Assistive Health Technology (NCAHT) and the National List of Essential Assistive Products (NLEAP) to address access gaps. However, challenges remain in policy implementation, funding mechanisms, manufacturing capacity, and last-mile delivery.
Conclusion: A multi-pronged approach combining strong policy frameworks, increased public funding, indigenous manufacturing, capacity building, and community engagement is essential to achieve equitable access to assistive technologies through India's healthcare system. Integration of AT into Universal Health Coverage represents a strategic pathway toward achieving Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 10.
Keywords: Assistive technology, Inequity in Assistive technology, healthcare equity, Functional impairment
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Bickenbach J. The World Report on Disability. Disability & Society. 2011;26(5):655-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.589198
2. Wong B, Singh K, Everett B, O'Brien KS, Ravilla T, Khanna RC, Chase H, Frick KD. The case for investment in eye health: systematic review and economic modelling analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Dec 1;101(12):786-799. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.289863. PMID: 38024247; PMCID: PMC10680113.
3. Frick KD, Foster A. The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2003;135(4):471-476.
4. Grider JL. The Economic Impact of Wheelchairs for the Disabled in Ethiopia [Master's Thesis]. University of San Francisco; 2014. Available from: https://repository.usfca.edu/thes/82
5. World Health Organisation. World Report on Hearing. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2021.
6. Albala S, Holloway C, Austin V, Kattel R. New economics of assistive technology: A call for a missions approach. Working Paper Series: IIPP WP 2021/04. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose; 2021.
7. Olusanya BO, Davis AC. Global investment to reduce the burden of hearing loss. The Lancet Global Health. 2022;10(1):e4-e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00508-8
8. Petersson I, Lilja M, Hammel J, Kottorp A. Impact of home modification services on ability in everyday life for people ageing with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2008;40(4):253-260. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0160
9. Zhang B, Zhou P. An Economic Evaluation Framework for Government-Funded Home Adaptation Schemes: A Quantitative Approach. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;8(3):345. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030345. PMID: 32961870; PMCID: PMC7551430.
10. Hanushek EA, Woessmann L. The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015.
11. Indian Council of Medical Research. National List of Essential Assistive Products. New Delhi: ICMR; 2024. Available from: https://www.icmr.gov.in/icmrobject/static/icmr/dist/images/pdf/reports/ICMR_Assistive_Technology_Product_List_WEB.pdf
12. Dyslexia Around the World: A Snapshot. ResearchGate; 2020. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338910143_Dyslexia_Around_the_World_A_Snapshot
13. Layton N, Murphy C, Bell D. From individual innovation to global impact: the Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE) innovation snapshot as a method for sharing and scaling. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2018;13(5):486-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1467971
14. Buckup S. The price of exclusion: The economic consequences of excluding people with disabilities from the workforce. ILO Employment Working Paper No. 43. Geneva: International Labour Organisation; 2009.
15. World Health Organisation. Global Report on Assistive Technology (GReAT). Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451
16. United Nations Development Programme. Sustainable Development Goals Report. New York: UNDP; 2020.
17. World Health Organisation. Improving access to assistive technology. No. EM/RC63/4. Cairo: World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2016.
18. World Health Organisation. Improving access to assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 2025 Jan 4]. Available from: https://www.who.int/activities/improving-access-to-assistive-technology
19. World Health Organisation. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
20. Assistive Technology (Standards and Accessibility) Rules, 2025 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec 10]. Available from: https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3e58aea67b01fa747687f038dfde066f6/uploads/2025/09/20250930960097846.pdf
21. Srivastava RK, Sharma HK, Grover A, Malik R, Singh R. Global practices in AT provision: considerations for a national assistive technology policy for health in India. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences [Internet]. 2025 Oct;6:1664118. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41293425/