Can a Small Sample Size Capture a Big Truth? A Hypothetical Simulation Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of AI vs Radiologist in Tuberculosis Detection through X-rays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56450/JEFI.2026.v4i01.010Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Radiologist, Tuberculosis, Monte Carlo Method, Sample Size, Reproducibility of ResultsAbstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being adopted in diagnostic radiology. However, early-phase evaluations often rely on small sample sizes due to logistical constraints. It remains unclear whether such small studies can reliably detect real differences in diagnostic accuracy between AI models and human experts. Objectives: To assess whether a small sample size (n = 30) can reliably detect statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between an AI model and a radiologist for TB detection from chest X-rays under varying performance scenarios. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted in R (v4.5.0) using 1000 iterations per scenario. Three diagnostic accuracy scenarios tested were: scenario 1. AI (98%) vs Radiologist (70%), scenario 2. AI (90%) vs Radiologist (75%) and scenario 3. AI (92%) vs Radiologist (80%). Predictions were simulated using defined sensitivity and specificity values, and accuracy was computed. A one-sided paired t-test assessed whether AI outperformed the radiologist. Empirical power was calculated as the proportion of simulations yielding p-values < 0.05. Results: Scenario 1 with a large accuracy gap (28.2%), achieved 96% empirical power. Scenarios 2 and 3, with moderate and small differences (~14%), achieved only 46.8% and 37.5% power, respectively. Conclusion: Small samples can detect large diagnostic performance differences but are unreliable for moderate or small differences.
Downloads
References
1. Derricho E. Can a Small Sample Reflect a Whole Population? A Simulation Study on Treatment Efficacy [Internet]. Medium. 2025 [cited 2025 May 10]. Available from: https://medium.com/@ederricho1/can-a-small-sample-reflect-a-whole-population-a-simulation-study-on-treatment-efficacy-50f0b2a24258
2. R Core Team (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
3. Šimundić AM. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11.
4. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: Diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994;308(6943):1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frederick Satiro Vaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
