Prevalence of Low Bone Mineral Density and Assessment of Screening Tools in a Rural Area of Delhi

93

Authors

  • Anubha gupta VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital Author
  • Ghurumourthy D. Author
  • Geeta Yadav Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56450/

Keywords:

Osteopenia, Osteoporosis, Bone Mineral Density, Menopause

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoporosis poses a disproportionate burden on postmenopausal women, yet access to DXA-based bone mineral density (BMD) measurement remains severely limited in rural India, with only 700–800 scanners serving over 140 million postmenopausal women. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in a rural Delhi cohort, examine associations with lifestyle and menopausal symptom burden, and compare the diagnostic performance of five validated screening tools—OSTA, SCORE, ABONE, ORAI, and OSIRIS—against DXA-measured BMD.

Methodology

This community-based cross-sectional study enrolled 94 women aged 40 years and above at the Rural Health Training Centre, Najafgarh, under the SNSP Abhiyan. BMD was assessed via portable peripheral DEXA at the right calcaneus and classified per WHO T-score criteria. Participants completed a sociodemographic and lifestyle questionnaire and the validated 11-item Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Diagnostic performance of five risk scores was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ROC curve analysis.

Results

Mean age was 52.5 ± 8.8 years and mean age of menopause was 44.8 ± 9.9 years. BMD was abnormal in 93.7% of participants—51.1% osteopenic and 42.6% osteoporotic. Lower educational status was significantly associated with abnormal BMD (p = 0.028). Multivariate regression identified age (p = 0.038) and somatic menopausal symptom severity (p = 0.026) as independent predictors of reduced BMD. OSTA demonstrated the highest sensitivity (85.7%) and NPV (98.1%) with an AUC of 0.73. SCORE had the highest PPV (85%) but poor sensitivity (42.5%) and an AUC of 0.50. ABONE, ORAI, and OSIRIS showed moderate performance with AUCs of 0.53–0.57.

Conclusion

This study reveals a high burden of low BMD among rural women in Delhi. OSTA emerged as the most effective primary screening tool, supporting targeted DXA referrals in resource-constrained settings. Age and somatic menopausal symptom severity were significant predictors of reduced BMD, highlighting the skeletal consequences of estrogen deficiency. Integration of OSTA into rural primary care protocols, alongside development of population-specific screening questionnaires, is strongly recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Chinese Orthopaedic Association. Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Orthop Surg. 2009;1(4):251–7. doi:10.1111/j.1757-7861.2009.00047.x

2. Moreland BL, Legha JK, Thomas KE, Burns ER. Hip fracture-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths by mechanism of injury among adults aged 65 and older, United States 2019. J Aging Health. 2022;35(5–6):345–55. doi:10.1177/08982643221132450

3. Morin SN, Leslie WD, Schousboe JT. Osteoporosis: A review. JAMA. 2025;334(10):894–907. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.6003

4. Huang CF, Chen JF, Reid IR, Chan WP, Ebeling PR, Langdahl B, et al. Asia–Pacific consensus on osteoporotic fracture prevention in postmenopausal women with low bone mass or osteoporosis but no fragility fractures. J Formos Med Assoc. 2023;122(Suppl 1):S14–20. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2023.01.006

5. Bhadada SK, Chadha M, Sriram U, et al. The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16(1):102. doi:10.1007/s11657-021-00954-1

6. Lau EMC. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. In: Current Topics in Osteoporosis. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005. p. 1–16. doi:10.1142/9789812701220_0001

7. Slart RHJA, Punda M, Ali DS, et al. Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025;52(3):539–63. doi:10.1007/s00259-024-06912-6

8. Agarwal K, Cherian KE, Kapoor N, et al. OSTA as a screening tool to predict osteoporosis in Indian postmenopausal women: A nationwide study. Arch Osteoporos. 2022;17(1):121. doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01159-w

9. Cherian KE, Kapoor N, Meeta M, Paul TV. Screening tools for osteoporosis in India: Where do we place them in current clinical care? J Midlife Health. 2021;12(4):257–62. doi:10.4103/jmh.jmh_216_21

10. Sharma A, Garg A, Singh B. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in outpatients above 40 years of a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Int J Res Orthop. 2022;8(2):222–6.

Published

2026-04-17


Issue

Section

EFICON 2025 Abstracts

How to Cite

1.
gupta A, Ghurumourthy D., Yadav G. Prevalence of Low Bone Mineral Density and Assessment of Screening Tools in a Rural Area of Delhi: 93. JEFI [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 17 [cited 2026 Apr. 17];3((2Supp). Available from: https://efi.org.in/journal/index.php/JEFI/article/view/520

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)