Rapid Multi – State Assessment Of Birth Waiting Homes Under NHM: Functioning, Utilization, Cost-Effectiveness And Policy Implications
Reg No: 457
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56450/JEFI.2025.v3i2Suppl.067Abstract
Background: Maternal mortality remains a significant public health concern in India, particularly in tribal and geographically remote regions where delays in accessing institutional delivery care persist. Birth Waiting Homes (BWHs), supported under the National Health Mission (NHM), aim to reduce the second delay by providing temporary residential accommodation near delivery facilities for pregnant women from hard-to-reach areas. Despite scale-up across several states, systematic evidence on their functioning, utilisation, and effectiveness remains limited.
Aims & Objectives: This rapid multi-state assessment aimed to evaluate the functioning, operational models, utilisation patterns, cost structures, and policy relevance of BWHs across selected states. Specific objectives included assessing infrastructure, governance mechanisms, staffing arrangements, user experiences, and their potential contribution to improving maternal health outcomes.
Methodology: A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was adopted across five states—Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Tripura, and Telangana—covering 14 functional BWHs in 10 districts. Data collection included facility assessments, stakeholder and beneficiary interviews, programme document review, and costing analysis. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
Results: Findings demonstrate considerable inter-state variation in performance and operational models. Odisha, operating largely through an NGO-supported model with defined standard operating procedures and dedicated staffing, achieved consistently high QSI scores (up to 88%) and higher utilisation with earlier pre-delivery admissions. In contrast, government-managed models in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat often functioned as extensions of antenatal wards, with weaker governance, limited preventive admissions, and lower QSI scores (50–71%). Infrastructure availability was generally adequate across states; however, gaps in dedicated staffing, monitoring systems, and structured referral linkages constrained effectiveness.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of BWHs depends less on infrastructure alone and more on preventive utilisation, dedicated HR, clear governance frameworks, and integration with antenatal and referral systems. Strengthened operational norms and earmarked recurrent funding are critical for scaling up BWHs in high-need geographies.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kalpana Pawalia, Bhavna Nahata, Kannan P, K Madan Gopal (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
