Sibling anesthesiologists suggest clinical logbooks to counterbalance research publications and mitigate disparity between research output and clinical output
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56450/JEFI.2024.v2i03.011Abstract
The question is which medical specialties are most commonly performing biomedical research. The question is which medical specialties are most commonly receiving research funding. The question is which medical specialties are most commonly suffering research addiction. Considering that delivery of healthcare for humanity is closely intertwined with innovation in science for humanity, clinicians benefitting professionally by creating public records of their clinical logbooks may be able to mitigate disadvantaged disparity in professional growth secondary to clinical output as compared to professional growth secondary to research output.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Divya Gupta, Deepak Gupta (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This means that you are free to:
- Share, copy, and redistribute the article in any medium or format
- Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the article
as long as you provide appropriate credit to the original work, include the authors' names, article title, journal name, and indicate that the work is licensed under CC BY. Any use of the material should not imply endorsement by the authors or the journal.
