Charting the Course: Telemedicine Trends, Regulatory Frameworks, and Implementation Challenges in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56450/JEFI.2025.v3i03.008Keywords:
COVID-19, Developing Countries, Information Technology, World Health OrganizationAbstract
Background: In low- and middle-income countries like India, telemedicine emerges as an important solution for healthcare delivery as geographical, workforce, and infrastructural disparities limit access to care. Objective: This article explores the evolution of telemedicine in India, with a focus on legal framework, policy shifts, implementation challenges, and comparison with global telemedicine. Methods: The method employed was a qualitative narrative review. Peer-reviewed Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus-indexed journal articles, World Health Organisation reports, and Indian government telemedicine laws and regulations were among the data sources. Documents published between 2000 and 2024 were evaluated for legislative provisions, implementation hurdles, and relevance, excluding technical or clinical reports without policy analysis or those in regional languages. Results: India has established a foundational regulatory structure for telemedicine through the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines (2020), which is backed by current laws like the Indian Medical Council Regulations (2002) and the Information Technology Act (2000). The COVID-19 epidemic sped up adoption, increased the number of teleconsultation modalities that are acceptable, and revealed structural limitations such as provider preparedness, digital inequality, and data privacy issues. Conclusion: Although India's telemedicine framework is flexible and forward-thinking, its successful implementation necessitates improved digital infrastructure, uniform training, strong data security measures, and ongoing regulatory improvement in line with international best practices.
Downloads
References
1. Ryu S. Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in member states: Report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (global observatory for eHealth series, volume 2). Healthc Inform Res [Internet]. 2012;18(2):153. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/50d2/39333bcafc744e1a9f3e1f49129a2946bdcb.pdf
2. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:154–161.
3. Rao KD, Peters DH. Urban health in India: many challenges, few solutions. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(12):e729–e730.
4. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
5. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.
6. National Medical Commission. Code of medical ethics regulations, 2002 [Internet]. New Delhi: National Medical Commission; 2002 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/rules-regulations/code-of-medical-ethics-regulations-2002/
7. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Telemedicine practice guidelines [Internet]. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2020 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in/assets/guidelines/Telemedicine_Practice_Guidelines.pdf
8. Venkatesh U, Aravind GP, Velmurugan A. Telemedicine practice guidelines in India: global implications in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. World Med Health Policy. 2022;14:589–599.
9. Government of India. Information Technology Act, 2000 [Internet]. New Delhi: Government of India; 2000 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://dot.gov.in/actrules/information-technology-act-2000
10. Government of India. Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945 [Internet]. New Delhi: Central Drugs Standard Control Organization; 2016 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/export/sites/CDSCO_WEB/Pdf-documents/acts_rules/2016DrugsandCosmeticsAct1940Rules1945.pdf
11. Iyengar K, Jain VK, Vaishya R. Pitfalls in telemedicine consultations in the era of COVID-19 and how to avoid them. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):797–799.
12. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016242.
13. Edirippulige S, Armfield NR. Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: a review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):273–282.
14. Reynolds R. Jan van Dijk. The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity; 2020. 208 p. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol [Internet]. 2021;72(1):136–8.
15. Bhandari N, Mahajan S. Data protection and privacy in digital health in India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2021;6(3):210–214.
16. Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract. 2021;17(2):218–221.
17. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission – Digital India [Internet]. New Delhi: MeitY, Government of India; 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/initiative/ayushman-bharat-digital-mission/
18. Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, et al. Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(5):309–313.
19. NHS England. Digital-First Primary Care: contracting rules [Internet]. London: NHS England; 2019 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/digital-first-primary-care-consultation.pdf
20. Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine. Telehealth framework and guidelines [Internet]. Brisbane: ACRRM; 2016 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.acrrm.org.au/docs/default-source/all-files/telehealth-framework-and-guidelines.pdf
21. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [cited 2025 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Epidemiology Foundation of India
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
